CONCLUSION
The capacity of a typical digital communication system following the principle of synchronized detection was derived under the assumption that the system operates on a flat fading MIMO channel and uses an interleaver to combat bursty error events. This is a frequently used model which underlies many practical communication systems, because most wellknown channel codes have been devised to combat statistically independent errors. The interleaver plays a crucial role in the derivation of the capacity, since it completely breaks up the channel memory. This assumption leads to uncorrelated received data symbols, and consequently to a channel model which lends itself to the computation of capacity. It must be mentioned that, exactly because the correlation between received data symbol vectors is not used, some information is "thrown away''. Differently phrased, communication systems which exploit that additional information will offer higher capacities, an issue which we are currently investigating.
The interleaver framework was then used to calculate the optimal channel sampling period L for flat fading channels with normalized Doppler frequencies ranging from 0.005, Â¼, 0.05. It was shown that especially for low Doppler frequencies a proper choice of L is very important in order to limit any capacity losses. Furthermore, the results for the 4 Ã—4 MIMO system demonstrate that for low Doppler frequencies capacity scales almost linearly with the number of antenna pairs, whereas for increasingly higher Doppler frequencies capacity eventually degrades substantially. This degradation is a direct result of the growing need for pilots when the number of transmit antennas is increased. Considering that the percentage of the data rate which is dedicated to pilots grows linearly with the number of transmit antennas, it becomes clear that, for a large amount of antennas and a rapidly varying channel, DA channel estimation becomes problematic. At the higher Doppler frequencies and higher SNRs this leads to the fact that capacity continuously increases right up to the Nyquist sampled channel, an observation which led us to examine the case of an undersampled channel more closely. It turned out that, at least for the setup considered here, undersampling did not result in an increased capacity. This is due to the fact that once aliasing occurs, the MSE of the channel estimate increases sharply, and thus further reduces the capacity, even though fewer pilot symbols are used.
We would like to remark that there do exist some cases in which undersampling leads to a capacity increase (e.g. for very low SNRs or for small symbol alphabets). In such a case, or when a high Doppler frequency leads to intolerable degradations, coherent detection with DA channel estimation proves inefficient. Perhaps differential spacetime modulation strategies which were recently published in [15] and [ name="CITEhochwald" rtekeep="1">16] constitute a remedy. For small symbol alphabets, another alternative might be to employ blind channel estimation schemes, which exploit the structure inherent in the modulation. The larger the symbol alphabet, though, the more it lacks this inherent structure and therefore blind channel estimation schemes are not a sensible alternative for large symbol alphabets.
APPENDIX
Mutual Information of a Flat Fading Channel with Interleaver/Deinterleaver
If the chain rule for information [2] is applied to equation (8) it can be rewritten as

Furthermore, it is assumed that the interleaving/deinterleaving operation has completely broken up the channel memory. Consequently, a received symbol vector z_{k} does not convey any information about A_{j Â¹ k}. Thus, for j Â¹ k we have that
 (35) 
Likewise, since any z_{k} or A_{k} do neither depend on z_{0}, Â¼, z_{k1} nor on A_{0}, Â¼, A_{k1}, for k=j, we arrive at

The flat fading channel with interleaver/deinterleaver is therefore completely characterized by the distribution p(z_{k}  A_{k},A_{P},z_{P}).
Contact
Jens Baltersee, Gunnar Braun, Meik Dörpinghaus
More Infos
References
References
Heinrich Meyr, Marc Moeneclaey and Stefan Fechtel. Digital Communication Receivers : Synchronization, Channel Estimation and Signal Processing, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.
Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991.
John G. Proakis. Digital Communications (Second Edition), McGrawHill, New York, 1989.
Steven M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing  Estimation Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1993.
William C. Jakes. Microwave Mobile Communications, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974.
Guiseppe Caire, Giorgio Taricco, Ezio Biglieri. "BitInterleaved Coded Modulation'', IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 927946, May 1998
Jens Baltersee, Gunnar Fock, Heinrich Meyr. "An Information Theoretic Foundation of Synchronized Detection'', submitted to IEEE Trans. Communications
Thomas L. Marzetta, and Bertrand M. Hochwald "Capacity of a Mobile MultipleAntenna Communication link in Rayleigh Flat Fading'', IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 139157, January 1999
Emre Telatar. "Capacity of Multiantenna Gaussian Channels'', European Transactions on Telecommunications, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 585595, NovemberDecember 1999
Amos Lapidoth, and Shlomo Shamai (Shitz). "Fading Channels: How Perfect need 'Perfect Side Information' be?'', Proceedings of Information Theory and Communications Workshop, pp. 3638, 1999
Muriel Medard. "The Effect upon Channel Capacity in Wireless Communications of Perfect and Imperfect Knowledge of the Channel'', IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 933946, May 2000
Ashutosh Sabharwal, Elza Erkip, Behnaam Aazhang. "On Channel State Information in Multiple Antenna Block Fading Channels'', Proceedings of International Symposium on Information Theory and Its Applications, Honululu, Hawaii, November 2000
Ezio Biglieri, John Proakis, and Shlomo Shamai (Shitz) "Fading Channels: InformationTheoretic and Communications Aspects, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 26192692, October 1998
Gregory G. Raleigh, and John M. Cioffi. "SpatioTemporal Coding for Wireless Communications'', IEEE Trans. Communications, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 357366, March 1998
Brian L. Hughes. "Differential SpaceTime Modulation'', IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 25672578, November 2000
Bertrand M. Hochwald, and Wim Sweldens. "Differential Unitary SpaceTime Modulation'' IEEE Trans. Communications, Vol. 48, No. 12, pp. 20412052, December 2000